Last week, I was on the West Coast for the first time in almost twenty years. At dinner on our tamat night, I saw this sign on my way into the bathroom:
Now, living in the small mid-Atlantic town (/Hellhole) that I do, I'd never seen anything like that before. In fact, it kind of took me by surprise. Not only because of my own ignorance on the topic (I'd honestly never even considered this was an issue), but that a place of business would be cool enough to make it policy.
I've been home now for almost a week, and it has occurred to me that there are likely dozens, maybe even hundreds of groups that face persecution, that well-meaning (though uninformed) people such as myself know nothing about. We don't know their struggles, and know nothing of what it's like to walk a mile in their shoes. If only mainstream cinema could help.
Please don't think I'm making light of the socially aware movie, because I think that if done properly, they can make a difference.
I was too young to gauge the importance and social relevance of 1993's Philadelphia at the time of its release (I was 14), but seeing it for the first time recently, I feel it's safe to say that it mattered. Watching Tom Hanks (as Andrew Beckett) deteriorate firsthand while battling not only AIDS but the stigma that comes with it, must have opened eyes. Now, however, it almost feels dated, if not altogether primitive, to see the open persecution of a regular guy simply because he's gay.
Actually, Beckett was more than a regular guy, in fact, he was a damn fine employee. But when an older partner at the law firm where he works notices a lesion on his forehead, people begin to talk. Eventually, Beckett is terminated, not because of his lifestyle or illness (officially, anyway), but due to incompetence. Well, manufactured incompetence, actually. And after trying eight other lawyers to take his wrongful-termination case, Beckett turns to an old rival, Joe "the TV Guy" Miller, played by Denzel Washington. Miller is privately disgusted by homosexuals, but takes the case after seeing Beckett chastised in a local library. From there, it's a heavy dose of courtroom drama, liberally sprinkled with a clear social agenda: to thoughtfully portray the lives of people living (and dying) with AIDS in America.
Overall, the film works, as Hanks and Washington create characters that we care about and see ourselves in. Sure, it's a bit heavy-handed at times, and, in my opinion, comes off overly sentimental, but it's understandable within the context of when the film was made. As important as I think being the AIDS movie is, I think the responsibility is a heavy burden, sometimes suffocating the narrative. Remember, this is coming from someone looking back two decades later, in a world much more aware of the disease.
Aware of nothing, social or otherwise, are the Yays and Boos. They're not a big fan of discussing social issues, only because they're stupid and pointless. The Yays and Boos, that is, not the soc-...oh, nevermind.
Please don't think I'm making light of the socially aware movie, because I think that if done properly, they can make a difference.
I was too young to gauge the importance and social relevance of 1993's Philadelphia at the time of its release (I was 14), but seeing it for the first time recently, I feel it's safe to say that it mattered. Watching Tom Hanks (as Andrew Beckett) deteriorate firsthand while battling not only AIDS but the stigma that comes with it, must have opened eyes. Now, however, it almost feels dated, if not altogether primitive, to see the open persecution of a regular guy simply because he's gay.
Actually, Beckett was more than a regular guy, in fact, he was a damn fine employee. But when an older partner at the law firm where he works notices a lesion on his forehead, people begin to talk. Eventually, Beckett is terminated, not because of his lifestyle or illness (officially, anyway), but due to incompetence. Well, manufactured incompetence, actually. And after trying eight other lawyers to take his wrongful-termination case, Beckett turns to an old rival, Joe "the TV Guy" Miller, played by Denzel Washington. Miller is privately disgusted by homosexuals, but takes the case after seeing Beckett chastised in a local library. From there, it's a heavy dose of courtroom drama, liberally sprinkled with a clear social agenda: to thoughtfully portray the lives of people living (and dying) with AIDS in America.
Overall, the film works, as Hanks and Washington create characters that we care about and see ourselves in. Sure, it's a bit heavy-handed at times, and, in my opinion, comes off overly sentimental, but it's understandable within the context of when the film was made. As important as I think being the AIDS movie is, I think the responsibility is a heavy burden, sometimes suffocating the narrative. Remember, this is coming from someone looking back two decades later, in a world much more aware of the disease.
Aware of nothing, social or otherwise, are the Yays and Boos. They're not a big fan of discussing social issues, only because they're stupid and pointless. The Yays and Boos, that is, not the soc-...oh, nevermind.
Yaaaaaaaay!
- Tom Hanks and Denzel Washington certainly deliver. Hanks physical transformation is jarringly authentic, on par with Denzel's emotional one.
- I think that Springsteen's Streets of Philadelphia is an incredible song, even if when it's used it doesn't really make sense.
- Antonio Banderas shows up as Beckett's partner, and brings a kindness you rarely see from El Mariachi. I really enjoyed his character here.
- Dr. J appears randomly, which is a Boo, but he shows up in the scene where Denzel drops off the summons, which is totally a Yay.
- Andy's family? They are the best. The. Best.
- This flick, even though it's a constant knife to your heart, it moves so quickly. Very tightly paced.
- Dude. The scene where Denzel's Miller asks Beckett to take his shirt off floored me. I was crushed.
- And finally, the end. I feel like it was almost a cheap shot to literally emotionally cripple the soon-to-be exiting movie audience, but it's also the perfect way to end the story, too. Damn it.
Booooooo!
- Jason Robards plays a rich jerk. Surprise!
- Denzel's Joe Miller is a tough one to read. He's kind of a dick...a huge one. But to be fair, he has to embody all that is wrong with humanity.
- Library Guy. THIS GUY IS AN ASSHOLE. Oh, sorry. This guy is an asshole.
- Initially, I wanted to Boo Mary Steenburgen as the opposing legal team's shark. But, turns out, she was awesome. The Boo? Misguided preconceptions.
- Denzel's wink. I love it, sure, but what it lead to was ridiculous.
- I guess it's a classic scene, but I really didn't get the opera scene. Whatever it shows, it took me out of the movie. Like, far out.
- And finally, late in the trial, Andy goes down. Hard. Passes out. And while I get it, it also seemed completely f--king ridiculous. I mean, I'm thinking about, say, a thousand eyes are on him at all times, right? You think somebody might have noticed something was amiss?
You know, diversity is welcomed here, too. Honestly. We're not concerned with your age, sex, color or creed. And if you have to use the bathroom while you're reading this, we don't care what bathroom you use. Hell, from where we're standing? You don't even have to stand up. Just go..
Won't bother us one bit.
Won't bother us one bit.